The Utopian Capitalist

An intermittently maintained placeholder for random clips, bits, observations, paranoid fantasies, links, quotes, and other stuff which would otherwise emailed randomly. Pseudonymous to respect the fiction of internet anonymity. Who am I? A somewhat disgruntled (not yet curmudgeonly) fellow, inconsistent, contrary, generally optimistic, still idealistic (some say naive) explorer of the world and its wonders. Sometimes it's hard to know what to do - is this Blog a mere substitute for real action?

Monday, August 28, 2006

Can Fags go to Heaven?

If they can't, that must mean that God hates fags, right? The good Christian folk at Westboro Baptist Churchbelieve this to be true, and they put it right out there.

You should really check it out - the level of hate spewed out by these self-proclaimed Christians is astonishing. I'm just making an educated inference, but were He to check out that website, WWJD? "Christ wept".........

Not that the hatemongers at Westboro Baptist are unique - homosexuals are not welcome in the Mormon Church, either. And not only are they not able to attain the upper levels of the Celestial Kingdom, they are not able to be members in communion of Jesus Christ's only true Church in this world. (But we love them anyway.....I suppose).

I suppose that homosexuals are in good company - the ranks of those not going to heaven are pretty large - Muslims, Hindus, Atheists, Buddhists, and Jews are also not going to pass through the pearly gates. Does this mean I'll have to spend the eternities without access to a good cup of Chai or a meal comprised of other than tater tots, velveeta, jello, and mini-marshmallows?

Friday, August 25, 2006

Is the "War on Terror" Scaring you?

For a country founded by men who put their considerable wealth, priviledge, and status at risk to fight for an ideal, these here United States of America seem to be in the grip of an almost pathological fear. Fear of terrorists.......

If we do fear a terrorist attack to the point of running around like Henney-Penney, haven't we conceded to the terrorists? Haven't they won by making us afraid to the point of irrationality?

I lived in the UK during the height of the IRA "troubles" in 1975-1978. IRA bombings in England were a fairly regular occurrence during that period. But people went on with their lives. Stiff upper lip, and all that. One personal incident gives a flavour: I was working on an archaeological dig in York, and on Sunday went to mass at Yorkminster. This famous old cathedral is the type of landmark, especially a Protestant landmark, which might have been targeted by the IRA. When I went down to take communion, I left a small bag of laundry at the end of the pew in the aisle, without thinking other than it would be impolite to go to the bar clutching a bag of dirty underwear. I didn't return to retrieve my laundry until after the service had ended. When I picked it up, a very nice old lady said to me "We're so glad to see you pick up your bag - we were a little concerned that it might have been a bomb." I was surprised, and sheepishly apologized, and wished her and her friend a good day.

But on current reflection, what might have happened in GW's America under similar circumstances? Panicked 911 cell phone calls summoning SWAT teams and bomb units, arrests, triumphant press releases by Homeland Security that they got one, and the event used to justify further curtailments of Constitutional rights?

My wife has a friend whose medical condition requires her to go to see a specialist in San Francisco. The car journey requires her to cross the Bay Bridge. She went several months without seeing her doctor because she was afraid of a terrorist bombing of the Bay Bridge! And what news channel did she regularly watch - why Fox News, of course! And who does she support and vote for - why GW Bush and Dick Cheney.

Here is a word from one of their sponsors:


This is, in my opinion, the crux of the problem - in the UK, the government acted responsibly, and with restraint and good sense during the IRA troubles. And the people, while concerned, went about their business, expecting rationally that the chances of being bombed were low. Contrast this with the arrant fear-mongering of the Bush Administration and its shills Fox News and Talk Radio. Their blatant effort to foment fear in order to cement their power is worse than irresponsible - it is criminal.

The only right action in this regard is to stand up and resist.

No tengo miedo - I am not afraid!

I am Macaca

Republican Senator George Allen insults a young man on the campaign trail: I am Macaca.

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

Hempfest - Seattle

We just attended one day of Hempfest in Seattle. As first time attendees, we had some mixed reactions to the (admittedly sampled randomly) event:
Venue: Unfortunately, the park was in the midst of what appeared to be a huge building site. No trees, no shade, and sere brown grass on a very hot (california-style weather) day. The heat caused some health problems - a young man passed out in front of me, mostly due to dehydration. Keeping hydrated is not in the forefront of Cascadians' minds, apparently, like it is for Californians.
Organization: However, the organizers did a bang-up job. A very attractive girl on stilts responded to the young man who passed out, and literally flagged in a nurse and an EMT to look after him. (she was also handing out water bottles to people so they could keep hydrated in the sun). Two of us were enlisted to provide shade while the young man was attended to. This level of organization was general - litter was picked up, garbage cans were regularly emptied, and the whole event was orderly. Of course, this would not have happened if the attendees (huge crowd!) were not well-behaved. I saw no bad behaviour of any kind, not even a discouraging word! Contrast this to the behaviour of people at a similar event who have been drinking.......
Music: is why we were there. And what we experienced was ok, except for the rap. (Call me a fogey - I don't care). We got in a little dancing, not too strenuous (space a bit tight). Then walked a bit of the event, talked to some of the vendors, and were actually headed out when the siren call of female vocals pulled us into the Casbah Teahouse, under a huge hemp tent, with rugs and cushions for lounging, very tasty music, and delicious food. By that point I had run out of money, having spent my US and Canadian funds, but I had thirty Euros, which they were happy to take for a box of food (falafel, vegetarian stir-fry, salad, hummous, tzatziki, chai, fruit drinks - way more than we could eat). We gave most of it away to hungry youths. But - music - two bands, one from Bham (can't remember the name, female vocalist (does a good janis-style yell, also more mellow stuff), three piece band, and another vocalist Annia O'Neill, guitarist, and Conga) - was very entertaining and relaxing. Incidentally, the MC, Ngaio, was very entertaining in an understated way.
Speakers: One negative - the speakers seemed a little too confrontational, a little too aggressive, a little too doctrinaire to our taste. Ed Rosenthal's rant ("fire all the policemen and start again!") stands out in this genre. And the audience was not at all incited by it - quite the contrary, they were generally heading for the exits when the music stopped and the speakers began.
And - we missed hearing from Norm Stamper, who is very much a voice of reason rather than confrontation. Next year....
Overall, good for Vivian and crew to put on the festival in such an organized, orderly, professional manner. Keep up the good work.

More doggerel......

Why is it that people who die
and go get their pie in the sky
should, while watching us from on high,
not see the sad clown show, and cry?

Some "poetry", McGonigle himself retches!

Condi, Bush, and Dick;
The Neo-Cons' best pick?
Big Oil says "Pay Us"
By creating global chaos.
Is there a secret plan
To bolster up Iran?
A new war would be great
Because we're fueled by hate!

(rancid doggerel, I admit.....
but our government is s--t!)

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Thought for today from Anu Garg

Ignorance, allied with power, is the most ferocious enemy justice can have.
-James Baldwin, writer (1924-1987)

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

End Prohibition Now

A slightly forced theme to a serious issue - Prohibition!

What do you make of this?

Ford is recruiting "Warriors in Pink"

Am I being a curmudgeon, or is this pretty crass commercialism? Is it ok to try to sell cars by providing a themed outlet for peoples' love and concern for a woman in their life who has breast cancer?

I'm struggling with this - is the good of the efforts of those who participate greater than the commercial motivations of those who have sponsored the thing? (Or is the original motivation perhaps not commercial? Certainly the effort is now commercial). Is it possible for a company to do this without the taint of self-interest?

If this is truly charity, and I'm not convinced it is, it is certainly the lowest form of it. Maimonides systematised levels of charity in the Mishne Torah:

Maimonides' Eight Levels of Charity
Mishneh Torah, Laws of Charity, 10:7-14

There are eight levels of charity, each greater than the next.

[1] The greatest level, above which there is no greater, is to support a fellow Jew by endowing him with a gift or loan, or entering into a partnership with him, or finding employment for him, in order to strengthen his hand until he need no longer be dependent upon others...

[2] A lesser level of charity than this is to give to the poor without knowing to whom one gives, and without the recipient knowing from who he received. For this is performing a mitzvah solely for the sake of Heaven. This is like the "anonymous fund" that was in the Holy Temple [in Jerusalem]. There the righteous gave in secret, and the good poor profited in secret. Giving to a charity fund is similar to this mode of charity, though one should not contribute to a charity fund unless one knows that the person appointed over the fund is trustworthy and wise and a proper administrator, like Rabbi Hananya ben Teradyon.

[3] A lesser level of charity than this is when one knows to whom one gives, but the recipient does not know his benefactor. The greatest sages used to walk about in secret and put coins in the doors of the poor. It is worthy and truly good to do this if those who are responsible for distributing charity are not trustworthy.

[4] A lesser level of charity than this is when one does not know to whom one gives, but the poor person does know his benefactor. The greatest sages used to tie coins into their robes and throw them behind their backs, and the poor would come up and pick the coins out of their robes so that they would not be ashamed.

[5] A lesser level than this is when one gives to the poor person directly into his hand, but gives before being asked.

[6] A lesser level than this is when one gives to the poor person after being asked.

[7] A lesser level than this is when one gives inadequately, but gives gladly and with a smile.

[8] A lesser level than this is when one gives unwillingly

(interesting that the highest level of charity is to help a fellow Jew lift himself to self-sufficiency: gentiles need not apply?).

But I don't want to dilute my point that self-promoting charity or action in a good cause is somehow tainted. Could Ford have done something good about breast cancer without such a public splash? Of course - but it would have damaged their commercial purpose. WHich is, IMHO, what this regretable "Warriors in Pink" promotion is ALL about. It's like a sad joke......

Tuesday, August 15, 2006

George Soros in the Wall St. Journal:

A Self-Defeating War

By GEORGE SOROS
August 15, 2006; Page A12

The war on terror is a false metaphor that has led to counterproductive and self-defeating policies. Five years after 9/11, a misleading figure of speech applied literally has unleashed a real war fought on several fronts -- Iraq, Gaza, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Somalia -- a war that has killed thousands of innocent civilians and enraged millions around the world. Yet al Qaeda has not been subdued; a plot that could have claimed more victims than 9/11 has just been foiled by the vigilance of British intelligence.

Unfortunately, the "war on terror" metaphor was uncritically accepted by the American public as the obvious response to 9/11. It is now widely admitted that the invasion of Iraq was a blunder. But the war on terror remains the frame into which American policy has to fit. Most Democratic politicians subscribe to it for fear of being tagged as weak on defense.

What makes the war on terror self-defeating?

• First, war by its very nature creates innocent victims. A war waged against terrorists is even more likely to claim innocent victims because terrorists tend to keep their whereabouts hidden. The deaths, injuries and humiliation of civilians generate rage and resentment among their families and communities that in turn serves to build support for terrorists.

• Second, terrorism is an abstraction. It lumps together all political movements that use terrorist tactics. Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Sunni insurrection and the Mahdi army in Iraq are very different forces, but President Bush's global war on terror prevents us from differentiating between them and dealing with them accordingly. It inhibits much-needed negotiations with Iran and Syria because they are states that support terrorist groups.

• Third, the war on terror emphasizes military action while most territorial conflicts require political solutions. And, as the British have shown, al Qaeda is best dealt with by good intelligence. The war on terror increases the terrorist threat and makes the task of the intelligence agencies more difficult. Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri are still at large; we need to focus on finding them, and preventing attacks like the one foiled in England.

• Fourth, the war on terror drives a wedge between "us" and "them." We are innocent victims. They are perpetrators. But we fail to notice that we also become perpetrators in the process; the rest of the world, however, does notice. That is how such a wide gap has arisen between America and much of the world.


Taken together, these four factors ensure that the war on terror cannot be won. An endless war waged against an unseen enemy is doing great damage to our power and prestige abroad and to our open society at home. It has led to a dangerous extension of executive powers; it has tarnished our adherence to universal human rights; it has inhibited the critical process that is at the heart of an open society; and it has cost a lot of money. Most importantly, it has diverted attention from other urgent tasks that require American leadership, such as finishing the job we so correctly began in Afghanistan, addressing the looming global energy crisis, and dealing with nuclear proliferation.

With American influence at low ebb, the world is in danger of sliding into a vicious circle of escalating violence. We can escape it only if we Americans repudiate the war on terror as a false metaphor. If we persevere on the wrong course, the situation will continue to deteriorate. It is not our will that is being tested, but our understanding of reality. It is painful to admit that our current predicaments are brought about by our own misconceptions. However, not admitting it is bound to prove even more painful in the long run. The strength of an open society lies in its ability to recognize and correct its mistakes. This is the test that confronts us.

Mr. Soros, a financier, is author of "The Age of Fallibility: Consequences of the War on Terror" (Public Affairs, 2006)

The Road to Hell.......

One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their
intentions rather than their results.

-Milton Friedman, economist, Nobel laureate (1912- )

Monday, August 14, 2006

Israeli criticism of the war in Lebanon

From Glenn Greenwald posting at Salon.com

Ari Shavit is one of the most respected, veteran establishment journalists in Israel, and today, in the pages of Haaretz, he heaped blame on Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for the grave harm that the war in Lebanon has imposed on Israel:

"If Olmert runs away now from the war he initiated, he will not be able to remain prime minister for even one more day. Chutzpah has its limits. You cannot lead an entire nation to war promising victory, produce humiliating defeat and remain in power. You cannot bury 120 Israelis in cemeteries, keep a million Israelis in shelters for a month, wear down deterrent power, bring the next war very close, and then say -- oops, I made a mistake. That was not the intention. Pass me a cigar, please.

"Therefore, the day [Hezbollah leader Hassan] Nasrallah comes out of his bunker and declares victory to the whole world, Olmert must not be in the prime minister's office. Post-war battered and bleeding Israel needs a new start and a new leader. It needs a real prime minister."

Also in Haaretz, Israeli politician Yossi Sarid today said: "This war is, first and foremost, an Israeli tragedy. It is also a Lebanese tragedy and, in fact, an international one. When the Israeli cabinet decided to respond to the abduction of two soldiers by launching a war, it did not take into consideration the fact that no one would stop it ...

"The United States under Bush single-handedly destroyed its deterrent power and that of the free world, including Israel. If the American demon that has taken over Iraq is not so terrible and can be worn down, then just how terrible could the Israeli demon possibly be?"

These columns illustrate several important points:

1) Many Israelis are openly acknowledging that the Israel-Lebanon war has been a disaster for Israel;

2) Waging unnecessary wars, particularly when they are waged poorly, makes a nation much weaker, not stronger (see, e.g., Iraq);

3) Contrary to the reprehensible accusations in this country that opposition to, or criticism of, the Israel-Lebanon war is evidence of anti-Israel bias or even anti-Semitism, many people are opposed to the war -- and critical of President Bush's foolishly unrestrained support for it -- precisely because it is so harmful to Israel;

4) Israel's democracy is sufficiently healthy that journalists and other citizens not only can criticize the country's leader in the middle of a war but can call for his resignation -- without being branded a traitor, a subversive, a coward and all of the other slurs to which Bush critics in the U.S. are routinely subjected.

-- Glenn Greenwald

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Why shouldn't we......

Why shouldn't I love you
Who says I can't?
Why wouldn't you love me?
Who says you don't?

Is Iraq in Civil War?

Is it a civil war, or isn’t it?
ASK THIS | July 28, 2006
There are objective characteristics that all modern civil wars share. Harvard public policy professor Monica Toft lists six criteria. Hint: Iraq meets all of them.

By Monica Duffy Toft
monica_toft@harvard.edu

There are six criteria for considering a conflict a civil war.

Q. Is the focus of the war control over which group governs the political unit?

Q. Are there at least two groups of organized combatants?

Q. Is the state one of the combatants?

Q. Are there at least 1,000 battle deaths per year on average?

Q. Is the ratio of total deaths at least 95 percent to 5 percent? In other words, has the stronger side suffered at least 5 percent of the casualties?

Q. Is the war occurring within the boundaries of an internationally recognized state or entity
The article has a very interesting (and very long) list of other civil wars from 1940 to 2005.

Friday, August 11, 2006

Middle-Eastern Correspondent Aasif Mandvi

Very funny video from the Today Show courtesy of CrooksandLiars.com

On Self-Styled "Christians"

The problem with so many of these self-styled "Christians" is that they subscribe to
the I'm allright I'm saved and I'm going to Heaven school of latter-day pharisaic self-congratulatory, publically prayerfully adulatory, evangelically Bush-lovingly, hypocritically Limbaugh-fueled other-haters.

They'd do well to read Jesus's defence of the woman taken in adultery -
"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone".

And what was Christ's message if not love for all, especially to those who are weak and troubled?

Would Jesus bomb the crap out of Iraq?
Would Jesus hate libruls?
Would Jesus support GW Bush?

These evangelicals are a lot of things, but most of them would run Jesus out of town if he showed up today.
Weirdo hippy freak lazy bum talking a bunch of crap, hanging out with dirty whores and unemployed fishermen and geeks and cripples and the dregs of society.
I'm better than that - I'm a CHRISTIAN!

It is to puke.

Archibald MacLeish on Dissent

The dissenter is every human being at those moments of his life when he
resigns momentarily from the herd and thinks for himself.

-Archibald MacLeish, poet and librarian (1892-1982)

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Rap from France

Same rythms, rhyming schemes, but more literate (broader vocabulary), and: ACCORDIANS!

Radio Canada is the best!

Listen online......

Reefer Badness - Corporatist WR Hearst's prohibition creation

Reefer Badness
by Paul S Cilwa
Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 11:21:30 AM PDT

In colonial America, tomatoes were thought to be poisonous and were grown as an ornamental plant called the "love apple." The odor of the leaves made people think it was poisonous. It wasn't until the 1800s that tomatoes made their way into American cookbooks, always with instructions that they be cooked for at least three hours or else they "will not lose their raw taste."

Personally, I am not a big fan of tomatoes. But considering that I recently co-authored a political thriller in which the major characters grow medical marijuana (and smoke a little, too), one might assume that I am an experienced user of this other, so-called, "poisonous" plant. I am not. But marijuana's press has been just as misleading as that of the tomato once was.


A very thoughtful and informative article on the roots of cannabis prohibition in the USA.

Cesar Chavez on Vegetarianism


I became a vegetarian after realizing that animals feel afraid, cold, hungry and unhappy like we do.


-Cesar Chavez, farm worker and activist (1927-1993)

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

Lieberman Defeated by Crypto-Nazi Jew-haters

It's clear - this repudiation of the sainted Joe Lieberman, embodiment of all that is good and right, seer of eternal verities, speaker of unalloyed Truth - is the work of Godless evil crypto-Nazi jew-haters who would love nothing less than the utter destruction of Israel and the consignment of its citizens to the deeps.

And those who would criticise our President in these times of Holy War against the forces of Evil will be left behind, sad burning terrestrial rejects of the Rapture.

You'll get yours, Godless abortionist baby-killing anti-semitic married fag flag-burners!

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Fat is Good! From the Wall St. Journal....

Want Fat With That? A Surprising Way
To Make Vegetables More Nutritious
August 8, 2006; Page D1

Are you getting the most out of your fruits and vegetables?

That's the question researchers are trying to answer as they study how our bodies absorb the healthful nutrients and compounds in foods. What they are finding is that in our quest to cut calories and fat from our diets, we may be cutting out a lot more.

It turns out that some of the best stuff in fruits and vegetables -- certain vitamins and cancer-fighting compounds -- are "fat-soluble." That means some fat needs to be present for the body to adequately absorb the nutrients. But studies are now showing that people who opt for no-fat dressing or who skip adding foods like avocado or cheese to a dish to avoid fat calories, are getting far less out of their salads and other veggies.

"What we're finding is that if you don't have some fat in the meal, all these wonderful" compounds are missed, says Steven Clinton, program leader for molecular carcinogenesis and chemoprevention and the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center in Columbus. "If the nutrients don't get into your system, then what good are they?"

Dr. Clinton's latest research looks at how adding avocado -- which is relatively high in unsaturated fat -- to salsa or a salad affects how well the body absorbs healthful compounds in the foods. In particular, the study looked at absorption of carotenoids, the red, yellow and orange pigments found in many fruits and vegetables that are believed to have cancer-fighting properties.

For the salsa study, 11 test subjects were first given a meal of fat-free salsa and some bread. Another day, the same meal was offered, but this time avocado was added to the salsa, boosting the fat content of the meal to about 37% of calories. In checking blood levels of the test subjects, researchers found that the men and women absorbed an average of 4.4 times as much lycopene and 2.6 times as much beta carotene when the avocado was added to the food.

Lycopene is the red carotenoid found in tomatoes and watermelon that is being studied as a potential fighter of prostate and other cancers. Beta carotene is the orange pigment in fruits and vegetables that is used in the body's manufacture of vitamin A. Studies suggest that diets high in fruits and vegetables containing beta carotene are linked to lower cancer rates.

With the salad test, the impact of adding avocado was even greater. The first salad included romaine lettuce, baby spinach, shredded carrots and a no-fat dressing, resulting in a fat content of about 2%. After avocado was added, the fat content jumped to 42%. When the salad was consumed with the avocado, the 11 test subjects absorbed seven times the lutein and nearly 18 times the beta carotene. Lutein is a carotenoid found in many green vegetables and is linked with improved eye and heart health.

Researchers noted that a small portion of the increased carotenoid levels in the blood of test subjects could be attributed to the compounds present in the avocado. However the vast majority of the increase was attributed to better overall absorption once fat was present.

Study researchers say they were not only surprised by how much more absorption occurred with the avocado added to the meal, but they were taken aback at how little the body absorbed when no fats were present. "The fact that so little was absorbed when no fat was there was just amazing to me," says Dr. Clinton.

An earlier study done in 2004 by Ohio State University researchers showed a similar effect comparing salads consumed with no-fat, low-fat and full-fat salad dressings. When the seven test subjects consumed salads with no-fat dressing, the absorption of carotenoids was negligible. When a reduced-fat dressing was used, the added fat led to a higher absorption of alpha and beta carotene and lycopene. But there was substantially more absorption of the healthful compounds when full-fat dressing was used.

So far there isn't enough research to advise people how much fat they should consume with vegetables to get the optimal absorption of carotenoids. The basic advice is to still count calories and don't overdo the fats, choosing heart-healthy unsaturated fats like avocado or olive oil rather than foods with a high saturated-fat content.

A recent rat study by German researchers showed that the type of fat matters. They compared vitamin E absorption in rats that were fed diets with cottonseed oil or hydrogenated oils -- which contain unhealthy trans fats. The trans fats actually slowed the absorption of vitamin E compared with other type of fat.

For people watching their weight and the fat content of their diet, the balancing act might be tricky. The best nutrient absorption from the salad, for instance, occurred when diners ate dressing with 28 grams or about two tablespoons of canola oil. That translates to about 250 extra calories.

Nutritionists say diners should look at the overall fat content of the meal. A bowl of cereal with berries might be improved by using 2% milk or full-fat yogurt instead of skim milk. But if you're eating a meal, dietitians advise clients to choose one food item per meal with a significant amount of fat, and keep the other foods very low in fat.

"If you are having a hamburger for dinner and strawberries for dessert, it is not necessary to douse the berries in cream since the hamburger has plenty of fat to help you absorb the nutrients and phytochemicals from the berries," says Elizabeth Grainger, Ohio State research dietitian. "The key is always moderation."

Monday, August 07, 2006

Hearing too much crap?

When the residue of verbal defecation threatens to soil the foundation garments of civil discourse, you may find it helpful to wipe it from your ear.

Tom Tomorrow and the Rightwingoverse

Sunday, August 06, 2006

On Steven Harper and the Canadian Right

It seems strange that just as these here United States of America are waking up to the venality, mendacity, and sheer incompetence of the NeoConservative/Religious Right Axis currently running the Country (into the ground), Canada has elected a junior version of the same movement. Bush's "Mini-me", if you will.

Harper and the Alberta plastic hair brigade are using the Bush playbook: appeal to people's base instincts (fear, hatred, intolerance, and greed) by stressing law and order, inventing new threats to their safety to put more people under suspicion and into jail; pandering to authoritarian tendencies with militaristic displays and photo-op war exercises; using secrecy and informational discipline to stamp out dissenting voices and limit debate; and indirectly appealing to the evangelical movement by one-sidedly supporting the Zionist cause at the expense of Palestinians. Clearly, Canada is a more secular society and therefore the emotive religious issues used to great effect in the US are not available to the same degree - prayer in schools, the pledge of allegiance ("one country under God"). Similarly divisive issues are also well-used in the US which cannot be used in Canada: the burning of the flag amendment to the Constitution (!), and to a lesser extent, gay marriage (although this raises hackles in Canada, again, it is a more tolerant society). Worse, these emotional appeals are based on a paucity of fact, which is considered irrelevent to the issue: it is about pandering to people's prejudices (faith-based policymaking) rather than making rational decisions based on reasoned debate.

Nonetheless, these tactics, supported by a corporatist press with distressingly concentrated ownership (Izzie Asper's National Post, the brand flagship, is the print equivalent of Fox News - consistently propagating the corporatist line), have been successful in getting Harper & Co. into power, albeit minoritaire. And so they would stay, except for the prospect of a marriage of convenience with Quebec's Independentists, who Harper is actively, and apparently successfully courting. For them, it is a purely tactical move to advance their aim of an independent Quebec. Certainly most of the political perspectives and aims of the Alberta conservatives are antithetical to those of the Pequistes, who are unabashedly socialist in the French interventioniste tradition. Which is why the prospect of a majority Conservative government, elected with the necessary support of Quebec independentists, is so galling. The same marriage of convenience (or rather, alliance of whores) was successful in the eighties in producing the Mulroney government. The outcome was instructive: the Bloc Quebecois was formed, and became Quebec's voice in Ottawa, and the Conservative party dwindled to a pathetic rump, with not even enough seats to form an opposition, until it was rescued by the Alberta Alliance party. But the concessions to Quebec which were the political price for the marriage are still in place, and will always be so.

If the Harper minority government were to be a short-lived affair, punishment for the hubris and sense of entitlement which had become the hallmark of the entrenched Liberal government, all well and good. The worst parts of their agenda could never be implemented, and they might even do some good by shaking up the status quo. However, in a majority position, the Conservatives could and would wreak some serious damage to the Canadian body politic. They are being coy as to the depth of their true aims in order to lull people. But some there are some scary indicators: Harper's disavowing of the Kyoto protocols betrays the Conservatives' complete lack of respect for, or consciousness of, the importance of environmental policy; his pandering to GW Bush shows his willingness to sell out to US interests; the scandalous softwood lumber cave-in reinforces this; his actions on "law and order" issues, in the absence of any real growth in crime, show pandering to authoritarianism; and his support for lowering taxes and simultaneously cutting social programs such as universal daycare and healthcare betrays the Conservatives' true corporatist agenda.

Study, if you will, the complete mess the American body politic has become under the rule of Bush, and consider if you want the same thing in Canada. A majority Harper government is to me a shocking prospect.

The Secretary of State Speaks!

She's like a deer in the headlights....
This is the best we can put on the job? This is the best we can do? It's a clown show......one of those sad old pathetic clown shows that make you cringe.

Saturday, August 05, 2006

On Religion

It does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no God.

-Thomas Jefferson, third US president, architect and author(1743-1826)

This speaks to tolerance of others' beliefs. Of course, of your neighbour believes that his twenty gods oblige him to burn down his neighbour's house, then it certainly does injury.

However, Buddha had some interesting thoughts on belief formation which are very relevent, IMHO, to our time:
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe simply because it has been handed down over the generations. Do not believe in anything simply because it is rumored or spoken of by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is written in Holy Scriptures. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of teachers, elders, or wise men. Believe only after careful observation and analysis, when you find it agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all. Then accept it and live up to it.

The Buddha on Belief, from the Kalama Sutra

There is no substitute for direct observation. Eyes Open! Mouth reserved! (I mean, not watching TV, but engaging the world).

Wasp Rap.....

Pretty dang funny video


But do drink responsibly.........

Condoleezzaaaaaa!

Crisby Stills Nash & Young - same fight, different war

Here's a link to a

Crosby Stills Nash & Young video

How Legalizing Drugs Will End the Violence

This is an article by Norm Stamper, retired Seattle Chief of Police. He spent most of his professional life in the front lines of the so-called "War on Drugs", and has some very interesting arguments for ending prohibition. He is a board member of the organization Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP).

Back in the early 1960s, I often sneaked into Mexico at the San Diego-Tijuana border. Too young to cross legally, I'd coil up in the trunk of Charlie Romero's '54 Merc. My buddies and I would head straight for the notorious Blue Fox to guzzle Carta Blancas, shoot Cuervo Gold and take in the "adult entertainment" acts. It wasn't something I'd necessarily want my kid doing, but there was a certain innocence to it: tasting freedom, partaking of forbidden adult pleasures. The frontera of Mexico was a fun, safe place to visit.

All that has changed.

From Tijuana to Matamoros, drug gang violence along the U.S.-Mexico border has taken the lives of thousands -- cops, soldiers, drug dealers, often their families, other innocent citizens from both sides of the border. Even a cardinal of the Catholic Church. Many others have gone missing and are presumed dead.

In the mid-'90s, the Arellano brothers' drug cartel ruled Tijuana, perched atop the hierarchy of Mexico's multibillion dollar illegal drug trafficking industry. Using cars, planes and trucks -- and an intimate knowledge of NAFTA -- the Arellanos transported hundreds of tons of cocaine, heroin, marijuana and methamphetamine into American cities.

They enlisted U.S. drug gangs. In 1993, in my last days as San Diego's assistant police chief, the local gang Calle Treinte was implicated in the Arellano-inspired killing of Cardinal Juan Jesus Posadas Ocampo. The Arellanos bribed officials on both sides of the border, spending over $75 million annually on the Mexican side alone, to grease their illicit trafficking.

And they enforced their rule not just with murder but with torture. If Steven Soderbergh's gritty 2000 film "Traffic" caused you to squirm in your seat, the real-life story of Mexican drug dealing is even more disquieting. The brothers once kidnapped a rival's wife and children. With videotape running, they tossed two of the kids off a bridge, then sent their competitor a copy of the tape, along with the severed head of his wife. Another double-crosser had his skull crushed in a compression vice. And who can forget the carne asada BBQs, where the Arellanos would roast entire families over flaming tires?





Here's the rest of the story....

Friday, August 04, 2006

On Liberalism

Liberalism is trust of the people tempered by prudence. Conservatism is distrust of the people tempered by fear.


- William Gladstone, four-time British Prime Minister

On Our Birthright

I hope our wisdom will grow with our power, and teach us that the less we use our power the greater it will be.

-Thomas Jefferson

There once were great and wise men leading our country. What happened that we are now led by venal, incompetent, mendacious, and shameless war-mongers? They rule with anger, ignorance, and lies, they bring debt and shame upon our nation. They scruple to nothing in their lust for power and lucre.

They hold those things most important to our world in contempt: respect, understanding, husbandry of the earth. The richest nation in the history of the world, which could do so much to make it a better place, has descended
to barbarism. Is wasting its power to enrich a few. And at such a cost!

We are becoming a nation of Esau's, our golden birthright sold for a mess of pottage.